theofficeofnilsjohansson

Management Review Record

Document No.	JDS-RPT-[NNN]
Revision	DRAFT
Date	YYYY-MM-DD
Status	DRAFT
Author	Nils Johansson
Review period	[e.g., Q1 2026 / Annual 2026]

---

1. Review Inputs

ISO 9001:2015 clause 9.3.2 — the information considered during the review.

1.1 Status of Actions from Previous Reviews

Action	Due date	Status	Notes
[Action from last review]	YYYY-MM-DD	Open / Closed	[Progress notes]

1.2 Changes in External and Internal Issues

• Regulatory changes affecting scope of work
• New client requirements or market changes
• Changes in tools, technology, or workflows
• Changes in business scope or services offered

Summary of changes: [Describe any relevant changes, or “No significant changes”]

1.3 Quality Performance

Documents Produced This Period

Category	Count	Notes
Reports (RPT)
Drawings (DWG)
Projects (PRJ)
Blog posts (BLG)
Other

Nonconformances and Corrective Actions

Metric	Count
Nonconformances raised
Corrective actions completed
Corrective actions still open
Repeat nonconformances

Reference the corrective action log for details.

Audit Results

Audit	Date	Key findings
5S Audit Q[N]	YYYY-MM-DD	[Summary]

1.4 Client Feedback

Client / Project	Feedback	Action taken
[Client or project name]	[Summary of feedback]	[Response]

If no client feedback received, state “No formal feedback received this period.”

1.5 Process Performance

• Document creation procedure working effectively
• Revision control procedure working effectively
• Templates adequate for current work
• Registry accurate and up to date
• Komplekts being completed for finished projects
• Information design standards being followed

Issues identified: [Describe any process issues, or “None”]

1.6 Resource Adequacy

• Tools and software adequate for current work
• Time allocated for documentation is sufficient
• Skills and knowledge adequate for planned work

1.7 Risk and Opportunity

Risk / Opportunity	Likelihood	Impact	Action
[Description]	High / Med / Low	High / Med / Low	[Planned response]

2. Review Outputs

ISO 9001:2015 clause 9.3.3 — decisions and actions resulting from the review.

2.1 Improvement Actions

#	Action	Responsible	Due date	Priority
1	[Improvement action]	N. Johansson	YYYY-MM-DD	High / Med / Low

2.2 System Changes Needed

• Procedures to create or revise: [List or “None”]
• Templates to create or revise: [List or “None”]
• Quality manual updates needed: [List or “None”]

2.3 Resource Needs

[Any tools, training, or resources identified as needed]

2.4 Quality Objectives Review

Objective	Target	Actual	Status
All deliverables documented	100%	[%]	On track / Behind
Documents findable in <60s	100%	[%]	On track / Behind
Revisions traceable	100%	[%]	On track / Behind
Templates used consistently	100%	[%]	On track / Behind
Quarterly audits completed	4/year	[N]	On track / Behind
Komplekts complete	100%	[%]	On track / Behind

3. Overall Assessment

System effectiveness: [Effective / Partially effective / Needs improvement]

Key conclusion: [One-paragraph summary of the overall state of the QMS]

Next review date: YYYY-MM-DD

---

Revision History

Rev	Date	Author	Description
DRAFT	YYYY-MM-DD	Nils Johansson	Initial draft